France’s highest court delivered a significant judgment by blocking a central element of the “Duplomb law” — a proposal to reinstate the pesticide acetamiprid. This pesticide, banned in France since 2018 for its harmful effects on pollinators like bees, was deemed incompatible with the country’s constitutional duty to safeguard the environment and future generations. Although the court invalidated the pesticide clause, the remainder of the law was upheld.
Widespread Opposition Grows Against Farming Law Over Environmental and Public Health Concerns
The law, supported by President Macron’s government and major farming unions, aimed to ease restrictions on agricultural practices and speed up projects like water storage. However, it faced immediate resistance from scientists, health experts, and environmental groups who argued that the bill ignored long-term ecological and public health risks. The proposed return of acetamiprid became the focal point of criticism.
Public opposition quickly gained momentum. A student-led petition against the law amassed more than 2 million signatures, marking one of the largest petitions in French history. Many citizens and advocacy groups condemned the bill’s hasty passage through parliament, citing a lack of transparency and proper debate. Critics argued that the legislation prioritized short-term farming interests over biodiversity and environmental safety.
Court Ruling Challenges Macron’s Agenda, Reinforces France’s Commitment to Environmental Protection
The court’s decision is widely seen as a blow to Macron’s administration, which had stood by the bill despite the controversy. The ruling sends a strong message about the importance of environmental protections enshrined in French law. It reinforces the role of the judiciary in upholding these values, particularly when legislative efforts are perceived to compromise them.
While acetamiprid remains authorized in other European Union member states until 2033, France’s ruling may influence wider debates across the EU. Some lawmakers are already calling for a complete repeal of the Duplomb law. For now, environmental advocates see the court’s intervention as a crucial victory, both for the democratic process and the protection of ecosystems vital to sustainable agriculture.
